sharkster

i shall tease instead...its a very scary past n she's not into such practice anymore n its also personal so it wud b best kept buried...

damn the percentage of rich ppl is higher

hehe i cudnt resist...heck at least i didnt go into detail

this comment coming frm sum1 who has a dark past herself?no comment

well im sortd for friday den

nope dude the SL55 is Rusi Captain's...pretty popular golfer here n yea come to think of it the 911 is a better choice...have u heard that optional sports exhaust on the 996 turbo n 4S????absof**kinglutely gorgeous i change my preference to the 911

u jus stole the thread by replying twice j/k oh n it also depends on which generation of discovery but yea as ucscsades said...if its a company purchase d discovery is a gud bet

no machan i wont b driving it...i shall place it on a trailer n drag it around

true true but this was jus funny...plus as sum1 quoted sum time ago "i like to settle things the barbaric way" n yes...there will be blood

i think wat he's tryin to say is dilan posted the screenshot of the profile in the old forum n photoshoppd...now dat is sad here u go

well i dont like the camry's looks n the discovery is very difficult to maintain even if u source ur parts from ppl besides the agents...i quite like the sorento so i'd go for that but i dnt knw how the agents are for all 3

serious machan how can u lie so bad? "dilan changd yada yada yada"

yup around 99...basically the outgoin model

thats rite brother...n its a shitty 40kms indeed

i was informed today...posted a few days ago 23rd Feb

to be honest i havent read angels n demons as yet but i knw its of freemasonry...but i feel DVC topped it cos it made ppl question christianity which is obviusly far more vastly accepted than freemasonry...jus my opinion... as for the topic...this isnt exactly history truth be told...the authors in the 1982 book r judging history's validity n in dan brown's case, he blends sum truth wit fiction but his book is essentially a fictitious tale... but these goons r ranting abt him using their thots to make his money...the shitty thing is he actually referrd their book or so the article says...again my opinion

ok this reply was found IN THE OLD FORUM by an individual i shall not mention...pls don't delete dis madz cos i want the ppl concernd to see it... Topic Re: ***Beware of Gays in Hi5*** Author racer [jana] Date Created 2/23/2006 1:26:00 PM Message This msg is especially 4 Preveen, Dilan, Andrew, eshanka, Shakir, Import tuner [V6] im jana here!! hey guyz i told them that the cars r nt own 2 me!!! n i hav never seen thoz cars in SL, this is the truth & that Dilan has edit that pic & put (ME (RX7) & AHAMED IN STUNT) Watz goin on M-A-N!!! im havin only the nissan sunny FB14 (partly modified) u all can c thru hi5 gallery Admin plz don delete this msg every1 must c this!!!!! thank u for ur attention n i officially crown this shit "the king of gays in Hi5"...thanks for participating jana...u will recieve no award

but do u work 40kms from colombo?i didnt think so

well personally i dnt like the look of the montero so i wudnt notice one however special it may be plus they'r way too common to differentiate

topic for the day http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11589138/?GT1=7756 Authors claim ‘Da Vinci Code’ stole ideas Lawsuit in a London court could threaten release of upcoming film The Associated Press Updated: 5:32 p.m. ET Feb. 27, 2006 LONDON - It’s the latest twist for the mega-selling conspiracy thriller “The Da Vinci Code”: a lawsuit against the book’s publisher for breach of copyright that could taint the novel and delay the much-anticipated movie version. Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, authors of the 1982 nonfiction book “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail,” are suing publisher Random House, Inc. over the allegation that parts of their work formed the basis of Dan Brown’s novel, which has sold more than 40 million copies worldwide and remains high on best seller lists nearly three years after publication. If the writers succeed in securing an injunction to bar the use of their material, they could hold up the scheduled May 19 release of “The Da Vinci Code” film, starring Tom Hanks and directed by Ron Howard. Sony Pictures said it planned to release the film as scheduled. “This lawsuit is not about the movie, and we are proceeding with our plans,” said Jim Kelly, senior vice president of corporate communications at Sony Pictures Entertainment. Brown, who rarely speaks to the media, sat attentively before a judge in London’s High Court, a short walk from Temple Church — the place of worship founded by the Knights Templar — which figures in his novel. A New Hampshire native who still lives in his home state and has been working on a new novel, Brown is expected to give evidence here next week. Brown, was “interested in taking, and took, short cuts rather than doing any of the work himself,” Jonathan Rayner James, lawyer for Baigent and Leigh, told the court. Baigent, born in New Zealand, and Leigh, originally from the United States, are suing Random House, which also published their book. The company denies the claim and chief executive Gail Rebuck said in a statement that she believed the lawsuit was without merit. Both books hinge on the theory that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and they had a child, and that blood line survives to this day. The earlier book set out the notion that Christ did not die on the cross but lived later in France. James said his case was not attempting to “stultify creative endeavor,” or to claim a monopoly on ideas or historical debate, but to prove that Brown had “relied heavily” on the earlier work, published in Britain in 1982 and the following year in the United States. Though it does not relate to theft of specific sections of text, the case involves the alleged appropriation of themes and ideas from the earlier work, James said. Highlighted book at issue Brown’s wife, Blythe Brown, and Ohio University librarian Stan Planton scoured religious and historical texts on Brown’s behalf as he wrote his novel, typing up notes and in some instances, copying parts of the 1982 book, James said. The extent of “highlighted markings” in Blythe Brown’s copy of “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail” show it was not “merely consulted as an incidental reference source,” James said. “The markings are far more extensive and detailed than in any other book,” he told the court. Phrases used in both books to describe arguments that Jesus had been married showed similarities, James said. He told the court Brown’s work also appeared to reproduce “unusual and unlikely” connections between historical and religious figures set out in the earlier work. “This is not an idea that I would ever have found appealing. Being raised a Christian and having sung in my Church choir for 15 years, I’m well aware that Christ’s crucifixion is the very core of the Christian faith,” Brown told reporters outside the courtroom, referring to the argument in the 1982 book that Christ had not died. Brown has denied claims that he reproduced sections of argument from the 1982 book and said he disputes the proposition it makes that Jesus did not die on the cross. “Suggesting a married Jesus is one thing, but questioning the Resurrection undermines the very heart of Christian belief,” Brown said in a statement released to reporters. Jonathan Baldwin, representing Random House, said the two authors were making “wild allegations.” “The argument is completely unsupported by any facts and some of the allegations it makes are scandalous,” Baldwin told the court. Brown’s book also was the target of a previous lawsuit. In 2005, a U.S. judge in New York ruled that his book did not infringe on the copyrights of “Daughter of God,” by Lewis Perdue. The judge also ruled out any copyright violations of Perdue’s 1983 novel, “The Da Vinci Legacy.”

ferrari 360 for sure...

fuz runnin?dude i havent seen u walk fast

very true...u were almost in that boat anyways congrats on joinin the 500 mile high club lol

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHHAAAHAH NICEEEEEEEEEEE

oh no u got dimantha's jets working