Hmmm Pila, thats an idea - a 1300 Suzuki Swift/Cultus GTi taking down a D15 with a few mods. Yes, in stock form the car falls into 6-8 where it is rather uncompetitive but with a little tweaking, the G13B is very competitive in Modified upto 1400 cc.
But I digress. The main argument here is Honda vs. Muscle huh? Y'all are all missing the point. Manufacturers build cars for specific market segments, based on various contributing factors.
In North America, gasoline is very cheap so consumers are willing to spend more on fuel - therefore, manufacturers meet their demands with "low-tech" high cubic capacity engines because they don't have to waste their time on R&D into small displacement engines. In Asia and for the most part, Europe, this was not the case so historically, manufacturers had to provide consumers with engines that were very economical.
Of course, where there are cars there is racing so racing categories developed around the cars available in those markets. There was some interchange and 4-cyls have a following in North America as well but I think you'll find that subconsciously, most Americans that 'hate' V8s and swear by VTEC have anti-establishment issues and are 'sticking it to the man' by buying imports.
Which is better? The f**k should I know. To each his own, I say, and that should be the end of it. If you want to race, run what you brung and don't whine about superior bhp/litre output etc.
Ironically, with gas at almost $3 a gallon in the US, the big three have been losing market share and $$ because people have practically stopped buying SUVs and are looking at hybrids and econoboxes. If anybody thinks that the 'totally great' Civic and Honda brought down the big three, they are smoking crack. It was poor management, out of tune with the car buying public that caused their decline. And the spiralling costs of health benefits paid out to current and ex-workers. f**king UAW. I hate unions!