Pericles Posted November 24, 2011 Share Posted November 24, 2011 I'm surprised we haven't had a topic on this car before, so thought I'd open one. Few months ago, dad wanted a change, the Gen2 was over 5 years old, passing 40k, and while the initial devaluation was quite steep, was holding value for some time. So he got a trade in offer from the agents, and swapped the car for a new Persona. Its coming close on 3000kms now, and while dad has done most of the driving, I've done enough that I thought I'd put up an opinion. Initial impressions, I liked the car. Quite solid. Nice feel. A little less imaginative in the cabin than the Gen2, but pretty nice. Looks wise, it works just fine. Nice touches like cell phone holders. They had included a proper glove box in this, which was good Now, this particular car was a lower grade than the Gen2, which was full spec. So no leather seats, no cruise control, etc. Notable, this car has the newer engine over the old Gen2, the one were the cam profile switching actually works, unlike the old one where the campro was just a name. This is the 1.6l, disks all round. My feeling, this car is good. Quite comfortable, less sporty on the suspension than the Gen2, but quite good. Body roll is not too bad, but it doesn't like quick direction changes. It does hold the road quite well on a sweeping corner, but switching sides is not done confidently. Brakes are somewhat mushy. Probalby equal to the Gen2. Probably taken from the Gen2. Steering is still ESP, but its a lot tighter than the Gen2. One of my main complaints on the Gen2 was lack of steering feel, this at least does help with the illusion of steering feel a little. Dad doesn't like it tho Other major complaint on the Gen2, gearbox. This is a much, much better autobox. Also they seem to have done away with that daft drive-by-wire throttle control, which is good. I think this car is a little heavier than the Gen2, but since the engine is the same, its a little underpowered. The GB is good, so the initial bite and starting to move part is a lot better than the Gen2, but it can't keep on going from there. Or it might just be that they are going for a smoother acceleration pattern rather than savage acceleration. So it takes some time to get to a nice cruise speed, but is a very nice cruiser once it gets there. Sporty overtaking is not its forte, but it is a very relaxing drive. In no hurry, just smooth. Now to that bit that all the non-enthusiasts want to know. Close to 3000km, fuel consumption shows 8.2l per 100km. Its done one trip outstation, probably covered 500km. Also that was to Nuwara Eliya District, not town, so lots of low range climibing on slow, twisty, potholed roads involved. For those bad at maths, that means its doing better than 12. The Gen2 did slightly less than 10, over 9.5. And it has winker mirrors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pericles Posted November 24, 2011 Author Share Posted November 24, 2011 Oh, this is just a personal opinion, not endorsed by autolanka.com, all the usual legal disclaimers apply, blah blah blah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VVTi Posted November 24, 2011 Share Posted November 24, 2011 Peri I agree with you on that EPS issue. Had a flat recently in the Punto and drove a few Kms before I realized that a front wheel tire has shredded to pieces and was on the verge of catching fire. Absolutely no feed back... Not a fan of EPS anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.