Jump to content
  • Welcome to AutoLanka

    :action-smiley-028: We found you speeding on AutoLanka Forums without any registration! If you want the best experience, please sign in. Safe driving! 

Recommended Posts

Posted

They are doing some fine marketing.. was impressed with what they had done considering its TATA... how much would dose PS be in terms o BHP?

Zz

Posted

I saw the specs man.. i just dont get it why PS is used instead of BHP.. the car seems quite underpowered inspite of it being a turbo diesel.. 66 PS is nothin much it seems..

Zz

Posted

I saw the specs man.. i just dont get it why PS is used instead of BHP.. the car seems quite underpowered inspite of it being a turbo diesel.. 66 PS is nothin much it seems..

Zz

Divide é PS figure by 1.01387 to end up with é BHP figure

uh...thats not too bad... a 1980's Land Rover on a 2.5L enigne only chucked out abt 67BHP !!! :(

BHP is a rather inaccurate measurement given that é powerloss through é drive train is not taken into consideration...also its not all that standadized - in fact none o é measurements really are...its rather messy all these values BHP , RwHP , Kw , PS n é whole lot... :mellow:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

AutoLanka Cars For Sale

Post Your Ad Free [Click Here]



×
×
  • Create New...