Post-Whoring

ash · July 4, 2006

JwesT · July 4, 2006

Damnnnnnnnnn.... I want to learn this

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/3d58c99...cad581f365c.htm

Elvis_Pil · July 5, 2006

Damn you guys need to check out this link!! It's over the top! about a pro. streaker! He's even made reference to this years wim. championships where sherapova was a victim!!

http://www.thestreaker.org.uk/

Pericles · July 5, 2006

Damn you guys need to check out this link!! It's over the top! about a pro. streaker! He's even made reference to this years wim. championships where sherapova was a victim!!

http://www.thestreaker.org.uk/

well, according to the reports, Dementieva enjoyed the show more that Sharapova Watch that girl play, total focus. Doesn't let anything distract her. No smiles, no nothing. Then u get the big smile when she wins.

Yes, yes, she's one of my favorites on the WTA tour.

milinda · July 6, 2006

OK guys

.Its time to wear your seat belts. Prevention is always better.....cause all others drive on the roads are stupid idiots. ( start to think that way)

noaim · July 6, 2006

A Blonde airhead goes for a job interview in an office.

The interviewer starts with the basics.

"So, Miss, can you tell us your age, please?"

The blonde counts carefully on her fingers for half a minute before replying "Ehhhh... 22!"

The interviewer tries another straightforward one to break the ice.

"And can you tell us your height, please?"

The young lady stands up and produces a measuring tape from her handbag. She then traps one end under her foot and extends the tape to the top of her head. She checks the measurement and announces "Five foot two!"

This isn't looking good so the interviewer goes for the real basics; something the interviewee won't have to count, measure, or lookup.

"Just to confirm for our records, your name please?"

The airhead bobs her head from side to side for about ten seconds, mouthing something silently to herself, before replying "MANDY!"

The interviewer is completely baffled at this stage, so he asks -

"What in the world were you doing when I asked you your name?"

"Ohhhh, that!" replies the airhead...

" I was just running through that song -

'Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday dear...'

Pericles · July 6, 2006

OK guys

.Its time to wear your seat belts. Prevention is always better.....cause all others drive on the roads are stupid idiots. ( start to think that way)

Already do coz I already reached that conclusion.

Something one of my dad's friends told me long time ago, when I was a kid, stayed with me. I wasn't wearing the belt, and he told me to. I said I am not worried coz my dad is a good driver (he was driving at the time, these were those pre-license days.) He said it doesn't matter if ur dad is a good driver if the guy in the other car is an idiot.

I've seen that pic before in a mail. Apparently, they were leaving their wedding. She didn't make it. Shit scene.

Memphis · July 6, 2006

I've seen that pic before in a mail. Apparently, they were leaving their wedding. She didn't make it. Shit scene.

Well it seemed to me like they were going to a prom or something, isn't that a Corsage she's wearing on her left hand ?

Shitty scene nevertheless ... I saw this before too

Hola · July 6, 2006

Pericles · July 6, 2006

sooo, the Aston is funny... Whats the point of the other one? a 240SX?

Hola · July 7, 2006

sooo, the Aston is funny... Whats the point of the other one? a 240SX?

sorry bro, my bad...this is the complete one

Hanni · July 7, 2006

OK guys

.Its time to wear your seat belts. Prevention is always better.....cause all others drive on the roads are stupid idiots. ( start to think that way)

OK here's what I don't get - car has auto seatbelts, and yet the seatbelt is retracted, thought the door is still stuck...

maybe the auto system broke down and they never fixed, but it looks suspicious and nobody would drive like that anyway (cops would pull em over)

any idea of the origin of this photo?...

WackoBandit · July 7, 2006

seat belt saves lives....It saved mine...

JwesT · July 7, 2006

well, according to the reports, Dementieva enjoyed the show more that Sharapova Watch that girl play, total focus. Doesn't let anything distract her. No smiles, no nothing. Then u get the big smile when she wins.

Yes, yes, she's one of my favorites on the WTA tour.

and sharapova makes sound effects of over 101 decibles on every shot. this is scientifically proven, it was shown on news.

this is louder that drilling machine road maintainance guys used to drill roads.

but still i like the way she plays, but she lost in the semi finals to that man in women's clothes.

milinda · July 7, 2006

Guys Check this link. This 11 yrs old girl really has got a voice of an angel

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/170944/amazing_11_year_old/

Hola · July 8, 2006

seat belt saves lives....It saved mine...

Lets hear your story!

Watchman · July 8, 2006

OK guys

.Its time to wear your seat belts. Prevention is always better.....cause all others drive on the roads are stupid idiots. ( start to think that way)

I too have seen this before and it is VERY effective....

though i always thought that this was more a staged picture, for a number of reasons:

1) Look at the car. the roof too is crumbled.. and its a head on colission.. so how can the roof ger so crumbled up

2) i dont see ANY shattered glass in the picture.... you'd think there's be something left form t least one shattered winfshield...

3) look at the mudguard of the red car... it looks like it has collision from the side. More like scrathes...

4) The points of imact of the cars arent alligned.. the white car seems to be higher up.. in that case the white one would (should have) come up the hood of the red one.

5) for an accident this bad you'd think there'd be more than just one firefighter... at leats a couple of paramedics as well.. not to mention the curious on-lookers!!!

So what do you guys think? staged or no it gived out its message very well!

sharkster · July 8, 2006

first of all dilesh wat makes u think these r the only 2 cars involved?

tuk tuk · July 8, 2006

I too have seen this before and it is VERY effective....

though i always thought that this was more a staged picture, for a number of reasons:

Machang, I don't care to comment on whether its staged or not BUT....

1) Look at the car. the roof too is crumbled.. and its a head on colission.. so how can the roof ger so crumbled up The force of impact is directed up, under and around the passenger cell and as a result in head on crashes even though there's no direct contact you'll see roof's, doors and A pillars get warped.

2) i dont see ANY shattered glass in the picture.... you'd think there's be something left form t least one shattered winfshield... Perhaps the force of the impact dispersed them, or the fact that this girl went through the windshield might have dispersed everything out and away from the angle the camera caught.

3) look at the mudguard of the red car... it looks like it has collision from the side. More like scrathes... Like 'sharkster' mentioned, there could have been more than one car involved, plus the car could have hit the side walls / side barriers along the side of the road.

4) The points of imact of the cars arent alligned.. the white car seems to be higher up.. in that case the white one would (should have) come up the hood of the red one. Not necessary; if it was a smaller SUV or a crossover vehicle impacting it, most likely it would hit and bounce directly backwards or off to the side. Check out front impact crash test videos on those vehicles, even through the ride height's different you'll see they rarely 'ride up' on the other car.

5) for an accident this bad you'd think there'd be more than just one firefighter... at leats a couple of paramedics as well.. not to mention the curious on-lookers!!! There could be a ton of Firemen or Paramedics off to the side for its a very specificly angled close-up that the photographer caught. As for on lookers rushing up- it ain't Sri Lanka. Besides if this happened on a highway that streach would be shut down as soon as the ERT's got on scene and if it weren't no-one would get out of their cars when there are ERT's around.

6) Its probable the girl flew out through the windscreen dispite having a secured selt belt for the safety bets shown on the car are the type that automatically ride along tracks on the sides of the door and position themselves over the shoulder of the occupant when the vehicle shifts into drive. This type of design was popular in the 80's but was later deemed ineffective at keeping occupents securely in place in the event of a crash; for during accidents occupants kept 'slipping though' the belt or the belt anchor got ripped out of the tracks it rode in.

So what do you guys think? staged or no it gived out its message very well! Staged or not, like you say it certainly serves its purpose.

Watchman · July 8, 2006

first of all dilesh wat makes u think these r the only 2 cars involved?

true i guess.... there may have been more than 2. still what about the other factors

Watchman · July 8, 2006

Machang, I don't care to comment on whether its staged or not BUT....

The force of impact is directed up, under and around the passenger cell and as a result in head on crashes even though there's no direct contact you'll see roof's, doors and A pillars get warped. Ya, tey get wrapped.. more or less the metal fold in one direction. here its crumbled, meaning frce for multiple angles.

2) Perhaps the force of the impact dispersed them, or the fact that this girl went through the windshield might have dispersed everything out and away from the angle the camera caught. Kinda inlikely for every chred of glass to have flown so far away.

3) Like 'sharkster' mentioned, there could have been more than one car involved, plus the car could have hit the side walls / side barriers along the side of the road. a 3rd car is more likely but not a wall. the mudguard is kinda depressed from the side. meaning force.

4) Not necessary; if it was a smaller SUV or a crossover vehicle impacting it, most likely it would hit and bounce directly backwards or off to the side. Check out front impact crash test videos on those vehicles, even through the ride height's different you'll see they rarely 'ride up' on the other car. look at the front corner of the mudguard.. something HAS ridden up the red car.

5) There could be a ton of Firemen or Paramedics off to the side for its a very specificly angled close-up that the photographer caught. As for on lookers rushing up- it ain't Sri Lanka. Besides if this happened on a highway that streach would be shut down as soon as the ERT's got on scene and if it weren't no-one would get out of their cars when there are ERT's around. Well, if there were that many paramedics etc at the scene you'd find one who is more qualified in medical functions checking if she was alive rather than a fireman... Plus this couldnt have been a highway if it were head-on colission.

6) The safety belts shown on the car are the type that automatically ride along tracks on the sides of the door and position themselves over the shoulder of the driver when the vehicle shifts into drive. This type of design was popular in the 80's but was later deemed ineffective at keeping occupents securely in place in the event of a crash; for during accidents occupents kept 'slipping though' the belt or the belt anchor got ripped out of the tracks it rode in.

i put i a couple of facts up in Tuk Tuks post.

This is turnig out to be a an episode of CSI or something than a POst-whore thread ... hahahahaa!!

tuk tuk · July 8, 2006

The force of impact is directed up, under and around the passenger cell and as a result in head on crashes even though there's no direct contact you'll see roof's, doors and A pillars get warped. Ya, tey get wrapped.. more or less the metal fold in one direction. here its crumbled, meaning frce for multiple angles.

2) Perhaps the force of the impact dispersed them, or the fact that this girl went through the windshield might have dispersed everything out and away from the angle the camera caught. Kinda inlikely for every chred of glass to have flown so far away.

3) Like 'sharkster' mentioned, there could have been more than one car involved, plus the car could have hit the side walls / side barriers along the side of the road. a 3rd car is more likely but not a wall. the mudguard is kinda depressed from the side. meaning force.

4) Not necessary; if it was a smaller SUV or a crossover vehicle impacting it, most likely it would hit and bounce directly backwards or off to the side. Check out front impact crash test videos on those vehicles, even through the ride height's different you'll see they rarely 'ride up' on the other car. look at the front corner of the mudguard.. something HAS ridden up the red car.

5) There could be a ton of Firemen or Paramedics off to the side for its a very specificly angled close-up that the photographer caught. As for on lookers rushing up- it ain't Sri Lanka. Besides if this happened on a highway that streach would be shut down as soon as the ERT's got on scene and if it weren't no-one would get out of their cars when there are ERT's around. Well, if there were that many paramedics etc at the scene you'd find one who is more qualified in medical functions checking if she was alive rather than a fireman... Plus this couldnt have been a highway if it were head-on colission.

6) The safety belts shown on the car are the type that automatically ride along tracks on the sides of the door and position themselves over the shoulder of the driver when the vehicle shifts into drive. This type of design was popular in the 80's but was later deemed ineffective at keeping occupents securely in place in the event of a crash; for during accidents occupents kept 'slipping though' the belt or the belt anchor got ripped out of the tracks it rode in.

i put i a couple of facts up in Tuk Tuks post.

This is turnig out to be a an episode of CSI or something than a POst-whore thread ... hahahahaa!!

10 a, tey get wrapped.. more or less the metal fold in one direction. here its crumbled, meaning frce for multiple angles. As far as I know there are multiple forces acting in a collision, and since they act in conjuction with each other its likely that 'multiple angles' as you put it are created.

3) Like 'sharkster' mentioned, there could have been more than one car involved, plus the car could have hit the side walls / side barriers along the side of the road. a 3rd car is more likely but not a wall. the mudguard is kinda depressed from the side. meaning force. Thought you said it looked like scratches?

4) Not necessary; if it was a smaller SUV or a crossover vehicle impacting it, most likely it would hit and bounce directly backwards or off to the side. Check out front impact crash test videos on those vehicles, even through the ride height's different you'll see they rarely 'ride up' on the other car. look at the front corner of the mudguard.. something HAS ridden up the red car. Didn't you say earlier there was NO indication of the car's riding up?

5) There could be a ton of Firemen or Paramedics off to the side for its a very specificly angled close-up that the photographer caught. As for on lookers rushing up- it ain't Sri Lanka. Besides if this happened on a highway that streach would be shut down as soon as the ERT's got on scene and if it weren't no-one would get out of their cars when there are ERT's around. Well, if there were that many paramedics etc at the scene you'd find one who is more qualified in medical functions checking if she was alive rather than a fireman... Plus this couldnt have been a highway if it were head-on colission. Maybe the fireman got there first. After all the picture is a single shot of an accident which could have been taken at any point. And ever seen accidents on the highway where cars cross over the median on to the other lane? I'm not saying it IS the highway, but it could still well be.

6) The safety belts shown on the car are the type that automatically ride along tracks on the sides of the door and position themselves over the shoulder of the driver when the vehicle shifts into drive. This type of design was popular in the 80's but was later deemed ineffective at keeping occupents securely in place in the event of a crash; for during accidents occupents kept 'slipping though' the belt or the belt anchor got ripped out of the tracks it rode in.

CSI? hardly!! Hahaha! More like two guys venting a ton of BS on a Sunday. Actually come to think of it, Most of CSI is improbable too so.....ah, what the hell

I too have seen this before and it is VERY effective....

though i always thought that this was more a staged picture, for a number of reasons:

1) Look at the car. the roof too is crumbled.. and its a head on colission.. so how can the roof ger so crumbled up

2) i dont see ANY shattered glass in the picture.... you'd think there's be something left form t least one shattered winfshield...

3) look at the mudguard of the red car... it looks like it has collision from the side. More like scrathes...

4) The points of imact of the cars arent alligned.. the white car seems to be higher up.. in that case the white one would (should have) come up the hood of the red one.

5) for an accident this bad you'd think there'd be more than just one firefighter... at leats a couple of paramedics as well.. not to mention the curious on-lookers!!!

So what do you guys think? staged or no it gived out its message very well!

Pericles · July 10, 2006

4) Not necessary; if it was a smaller SUV or a crossover vehicle impacting it, most likely it would hit and bounce directly backwards or off to the side. Check out front impact crash test videos on those vehicles, even through the ride height's different you'll see they rarely 'ride up' on the other car. look at the front corner of the mudguard.. something HAS ridden up the red car.

5) There could be a ton of Firemen or Paramedics off to the side for its a very specificly angled close-up that the photographer caught. As for on lookers rushing up- it ain't Sri Lanka. Besides if this happened on a highway that streach would be shut down as soon as the ERT's got on scene and if it weren't no-one would get out of their cars when there are ERT's around. Well, if there were that many paramedics etc at the scene you'd find one who is more qualified in medical functions checking if she was alive rather than a fireman... Plus this couldnt have been a highway if it were head-on colission.

Id say it look more like a rear end collision. Like the red car rear ended the white one. Looks like the white ones backside to me (pardon my french) And maybe it rode up and slid down.