Jump to content
  • Welcome to AutoLanka

    :action-smiley-028: We found you speeding on AutoLanka Forums without any registration! If you want the best experience, please sign in. Safe driving! 

Question

Posted (edited)

Hi Guys,

Anyone here using the new 2017 Suzuki Swift Hybrid? Any user experiences and comparisons with similar hatchback hybrids (eg. Aqua, Fit). TIA :)

Edited by dilshant80

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted
On 11/1/2017 at 9:39 PM, dilshant80 said:

Hi Guys,

Anyone here using the new 2017 Suzuki Swift Hybrid? Any user experiences and comparisons with similar hatchback hybrids (eg. Aqua, Fit). TIA :)

Hi, I would also like to know the experience from anyone here who uses it. :)

  • Like 1
  • 0
Posted
On 12/3/2017 at 5:08 PM, hasisoft said:

Hi,

I just bought one.. How is the economy for you guys?

My good friend has it for last couple of months.

Around 12kmpl in colombo.

  • 0
Posted
9 hours ago, Quiet said:

whats the price. How is the ride

I prefer the Fit better than the Swift.

Even interior fit is better.

Economy Aqua is the best!

  • 0
Posted
21 minutes ago, zeem35 said:

I prefer the Fit better than the Swift.

Even interior fit is better.

Economy Aqua is the best!

Interesting....I found the new Swift is a bit less inspiring in the handling department than the old Swift. The 1.0L turbo lacked a bit of zippyness compared to the Hybrid. Te car was well put together but yes it lacked a tad bit of refinement compared to the Fit. But that has always been the case.

  • Like 1
  • 0
Posted
4 hours ago, iRage said:

Interesting....I found the new Swift is a bit less inspiring in the handling department than the old Swift. The 1.0L turbo lacked a bit of zippyness compared to the Hybrid. Te car was well put together but yes it lacked a tad bit of refinement compared to the Fit. But that has always been the case.

Is that the ‘boosterjet’?  

  • 0
Posted
1 hour ago, hasisoft said:

Seriously? The reviews says it's around 30kmpl????

Uhhh....are you sure read that right ?

Suzuki rates the Full Hybrid at 32kmpl, mild Hybrid at 27kmpl and the 1.0L Gasoline Rooster at 20kmpl on a JC08 cycle.

According to Japanese regulations the car needs to do 70% or more than the manufacturer's claims for it to retain the emissions ranking. In reality if you check most cars you will see that they all typically do about 30% less than what manufacturers claim (on average).

So you shouldn't be surprised if the Full Hybrid goes down to around 22, mild hybrid to around 18 and the 1L gas to about 14. 

  • 0
Posted
40 minutes ago, hasisoft said:

Ahh.. this is enlighting.. I can live with 18kmpl..???

No way 18 in Colombo unless an aqua or wagon r

  • 0
Posted

I see two version for sale here... One that retails for around 4 mill, and a second that retails for 5 mill (with paddle shift). 

Any idea if any of these are hybrids? 

  • 0
Posted
On 12/6/2017 at 7:27 AM, iRage said:

Uhhh....are you sure read that right ?

Suzuki rates the Full Hybrid at 32kmpl, mild Hybrid at 27kmpl and the 1.0L Gasoline Rooster at 20kmpl on a JC08 cycle.

According to Japanese regulations the car needs to do 70% or more than the manufacturer's claims for it to retain the emissions ranking. In reality if you check most cars you will see that they all typically do about 30% less than what manufacturers claim (on average).

So you shouldn't be surprised if the Full Hybrid goes down to around 22, mild hybrid to around 18 and the 1L gas to about 14. 

I’m looking for buy a economy fuel consumption car. If Rs mild hybrid one do 18kmpl, that’s suit for my preference with budget. Can i know the actual fuel consumption figures in colombo from a experienced person????

  • 0
Posted
4 hours ago, Samas said:

I’m looking for buy a economy fuel consumption car. If Rs mild hybrid one do 18kmpl, that’s suit for my preference with budget. Can i know the actual fuel consumption figures in colombo from a experienced person????

It does around 15-16 around Colombo.. I haven't seen it goes down beyond. I Have a mild hybrid RS

  • 0
Posted

I imported a suzuki swift Rst 2017 (Boosterjet) 1000cc  car and the front sensor cover in the front shell (grill) is

missing a Hambantota harbour. Also the back antenna aerial.

What is the effect if i continue to drive without these ?

 

  • 0
Posted
On 06/02/2018 at 10:18 PM, gayan30 said:

There are two variants in mild hybrid, Hybrid RS and Hybrid ML. Any one knows the difference, except the appearance?

Same mild hybrid system. RS has bodykit. ML does not

  • 0
Posted
3 minutes ago, Madura De Silva said:

I imported a suzuki swift Rst 2017 (Boosterjet) 1000cc  car and the front sensor cover in the front shell (grill) is

missing a Hambantota harbour. Also the back antenna aerial.

What is the effect if i continue to drive without these ?

 

can you attach a photo of the grill with the missing part?

  • 0
Posted (edited)
On 06/12/2017 at 7:51 AM, hasisoft said:

Ahh.. this is enlighting.. I can live with 18kmpl..???

Whats ur realistic fuel economy in the city?

Edited by dilshant80
  • 0
Posted
On 12/6/2017 at 7:27 AM, iRage said:

Uhhh....are you sure read that right ?

Suzuki rates the Full Hybrid at 32kmpl, mild Hybrid at 27kmpl and the 1.0L Gasoline Rooster at 20kmpl on a JC08 cycle.

According to Japanese regulations the car needs to do 70% or more than the manufacturer's claims for it to retain the emissions ranking. In reality if you check most cars you will see that they all typically do about 30% less than what manufacturers claim (on average).

So you shouldn't be surprised if the Full Hybrid goes down to around 22, mild hybrid to around 18 and the 1L gas to about 14. 

My experience is it does half in Colombo city traffic. Experience from the old Swift 1.2, FIT GP5, New Swift 1.0 RSt

  • Haha 1
  • 0
Posted
On 06/12/2017 at 7:27 AM, iRage said:

Uhhh....are you sure read that right ?

Suzuki rates the Full Hybrid at 32kmpl, mild Hybrid at 27kmpl and the 1.0L Gasoline Rooster at 20kmpl on a JC08 cycle.

According to Japanese regulations the car needs to do 70% or more than the manufacturer's claims for it to retain the emissions ranking. In reality if you check most cars you will see that they all typically do about 30% less than what manufacturers claim (on average).

So you shouldn't be surprised if the Full Hybrid goes down to around 22, mild hybrid to around 18 and the 1L gas to about 14. 

These figures are correct. What is hilarious is I found a guy on Facebook selling his 1.0L turbo Baleno claiming 18KMPL in the city and 22-24KMPL outstation! And apparently A** has fed him some bull claiming that as the engine gets older it will do over 22KMPL in the city! :D Looks like he has even beaten the JC08 figure LOL

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


AutoLanka Cars For Sale

Post Your Ad Free [Click Here]



×
×
  • Create New...