Jump to content

  • Welcome to AutoLanka

    :action-smiley-028: We found you speeding on AutoLanka Forums without any registration! If you want the best experience, please sign in. Safe driving! 

What Car Do You Think Has The Best Interior Of All Time?

Californikan

By Californikan
in General Automotive

 Share

Recommended Posts

Californikan Newbie

Californikan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

My finalists are....

2001 Nissan President

JP-President-071.jpg

1990 Honda NSX

2004-Acura-NSX-dash.jpg

1990 Toyota Soarer/Lexus SC

40626554.jpg

1999 Mercedes S Class

01603221990003-480-ucc.jpg

2004 Maserati Quattroporte

Maserati-Quattroporte-Interior.jpg

2011 Audi A8

2012-audi-a8-interior-610x406.jpg

2008 Lincoln MKS

t0ksjo.jpg

Winner for me is the current Audi A8.

Californikan Newbie

Californikan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

a thread to compare and find the best interior on a car you have never seen in person? are you really this retarded?

Actually I have seen every single one of these cars in person. And I have sat in all of them except the Bugatti.

Anyway that is not important, because your assertion that someone has to see something in person to determine if it is visually appealing to them or not is idiotic.

How do you think the thousands of architects, painters, sculptors, interior designers, landscape designers, town planners, aspiring car designers, and all visual artists in Sri Lanka learned their trade and artistic style? They sure as hell didn't go jetting around the world to see all those things in person to determine if the design appeals to them or not. They looked at books, videos, photos and drawings from around the world and learned from that.

Most twelve year old boys can look at a photo of a Ferrari or Lamborghini and know that they like it and it's their favorite car without ever having seen one. A person doesn't need to see something in person to determine if they like the design or not.

Only you would be so retarded to think in such a way.

Now, I would tell you to run along and to not pollute some other thread with your negativity and stupidity, but that is useless. You, negativity, and stupidity are one and the same.

VVTi Newbie

VVTi

Posted
Posted

Actually I have seen every single one of these cars in person. And I have sat in all of them except the Bugatti.

Anyway that is not important, because your assertion that someone has to see something in person to determine if it is visually appealing to them or not is idiotic.

How do you think the thousands of architects, painters, sculptors, interior designers, landscape designers, town planners, aspiring car designers, and all visual artists in Sri Lanka learned their trade and artistic style? They sure as hell didn't go jetting around the world to see all those things in person to determine if the design appeals to them or not. They looked at books, videos, photos and drawings from around the world and learned from that.

Most twelve year old boys can look at a photo of a Ferrari or Lamborghini and know that they like it and it's their favorite car without ever having seen one. A person doesn't need to see something in person to determine if they like the design or not.

Only you would be so retarded to think in such a way.

Now, I would tell you to run along and to not pollute some other thread with your negativity and stupidity, but that is useless. You, negativity, and stupidity are one and the same.

I like to see the interior of your skull. Want to say hooooooo and listen to that echo... ;)

  • Like 1
jdnet Newbie

jdnet

Posted
Posted

Anyway that is not important, because your assertion that someone has to see something in person to determine if it is visually appealing to them or not is idiotic.

Not at all. Pictures lie most of the time. Most are taken at angles that make the car loo good and are photoshopped. This is especially true when looking at interiors. To get a real idea of what car would have the best interior, you would have to sit in it and get a real life view. Eitherway googlepappa this is thread is just as boring as your other threads. Now don't cry ok?

Californikan Newbie

Californikan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I like the interior of Jessica Alba's pants. Got any pics Californikitron?

Dude, you're going about it completely backwards. You have to at least see it FIRST before knowing whether you like it or not. How can you like it if you've never seen it? Maybe its a hairy jungle in there. Maybe it's a perfectly waxed camel toe. You can't know if whats in her pants appeals to you until you have seen it first.

Californikan Newbie

Californikan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Not at all. Pictures lie most of the time. Most are taken at angles that make the car loo good and are photoshopped. This is especially true when looking at interiors. To get a real idea of what car would have the best interior, you would have to sit in it and get a real life view. Eitherway googlepappa this is thread is just as boring as your other threads. Now don't cry ok?

That's very limited, either-or thinking.

What you are saying is akin to telling someone who looks at a car magazine and has the opinion that they like the interior of the Ferrari 458, but don't like the interior of the Lamborghini Aventador that their opinion is useless and invalid because they have not seen the cars in person.

True, it is best to see something in person, but most people on the planet cannot go see in person all the things they would like to see. So what do they do? They do the next best thing. They look at a picture or video of it in a magazine, book, or computer.

Yes, it is best to see something in person, but since this is impractical or impossible for most people, forming an opinion based on a picture is the perfectly reasonable and valid next best option.

jdnet Newbie

jdnet

Posted
Posted

That's very limited, either-or thinking.

What you are saying is akin to telling someone who looks at a car magazine and has the opinion that they like the interior of the Ferrari 458, but don't like the interior of the Lamborghini Aventador that their opinion is useless and invalid because they have not seen the cars in person.

True, it is best to see something in person, but most people on the planet cannot go see in person all the things they would like to see. So what do they do? They do the next best thing. They look at a picture or video of it in a magazine, book, or computer.

Yes, it is best to see something in person, but since this is impractical or impossible for most people, forming an opinion based on a picture is the perfectly reasonable and valid next best option.

You are the kind of guy who would see a picture of a beautiful girl from Russia and pay mony to bring her down here only to find out she has an adams apple.

Californikan Newbie

Californikan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You are the kind of guy who would see a picture of a beautiful girl from Russia and pay mony to bring her down here only to find out she has an adams apple.

I like your example.

But, actually, I would look at a picture of that girl and use it to determine if I found her attractive or not. Nothing more, nothing less.

Girls are not like cars. Every girl is very different. A particular make and model of car is almost the same. If you like one brand new Ferrari 458, you will probably like them all. That's definitely not true for girls.

jdnet Newbie

jdnet

Posted
Posted (edited)

All these cars are ones that californikan has been inside while she was a working girl. Sure better than the interiors she saw in her other job as a lot lizzard.

Edited by jdnet
heavyD Newbie

heavyD

Posted
Posted

Big_D how many hp does that colour scheme put on

Oh it doesn't man, but it does improve aerodynamics. And unbeatable fuel economy too, since it doesn't use any anymore. :D

Californikan Newbie

Californikan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Eight generations of Honda Accord over a timespan of 35 years...

Best interior: 6th gen Accord (1998-2002)

6th gen JDM Accord interior

UJ0006204926_5_001.jpg

6th gen North American Accord interior

7ead1add-057a-e144-ec5b-09004c354e3f-500x353.jpg

Honorable mention: 5th gen Accord (1994-1997)

1994_honda_accord_4_dr_ex_sedan-pic-6328585663639519982.jpeg

toyota sucks Newbie

toyota sucks

Posted
Posted (edited)

Most twelve year old boys can look at a photo of a Ferrari or Lamborghini and know that they like it and it's their favorite car without ever having seen one. A person doesn't need to see something in person to determine if they like the design or not.

Please everyone don't mess up this twelve year old boy's dream,

His mom must have pasted those pics on his wall.

He is comparing today's cars with the 90s ones because they all will be old when he grows up.

Edited by toyota sucks
Californikan Newbie

Californikan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Please everyone don't mess up this twelve year old boy's dream,

His mom must have pasted those pics on his wall.

He is comparing today's cars with the 90s ones because they all will be old when he grows up.

Ahh...you're the fellow with the mental problems.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

AutoLanka Cars For Sale

Post Your Ad Free [Click Here]



×
×
  • Create New...