Kia Rio Hatchback or Mitsubishi Attrage

[kiario]

Hey guys, 

Good Day.....

Kinda new here, planning for an upgrade, 

kindly help me out to pick one out these two.

I got KIA RIO HATCHBACK and MITSUBISHI ATTRAGE on the list. heard that KIA RIO is efficient enough to do about 15Km per L, and ATTRAGE is more than 20Km per L... Planning to buy brand new condition, not used once.... but no idea about rest of the facts. kindly guide me through with further facts..

thanks.. 

[Crosswind]

19 hours ago, Frank said:

i looked up a few things on Attarge for you,

1. Spacious cabin

2. Best in class turning radius

3. 20.6km /l specified by manufacturer (this may depend on driving style)

4. Better resale value in comparison to a Korean model

5. Leather seats as standard

6. Better ground clearance

7. Proven MIVEC engine

This sounds like the sales talk given by a car salesman.

 

[Supra_Natural]

On 7/20/2016 at 11:56 AM, Frank said:

i looked up a few things on Attarge for you,

1. Spacious cabin

2. Best in class turning radius

3. 20.6km /l specified by manufacturer (this may depend on driving style)

4. Better resale value in comparison to a Korean model

5. Leather seats as standard

6. Better ground clearance

7. Proven MIVEC engine

How much is Mitsubishi paying you for the advert?

[zeem35]

Rio looks way better than attrage

[sathyajithj99]

2 hours ago, kiario said:

Hey guys, 

Good Day.....

Kinda new here, planning for an upgrade, 

kindly help me out to pick one out these two.

I got KIA RIO HATCHBACK and MITSUBISHI ATTRAGE on the list. heard that KIA RIO is efficient enough to do about 15Km per L, and ATTRAGE is more than 20Km per L... Planning to buy brand new condition, not used once.... but no idea about rest of the facts. kindly guide me through with further facts..

thanks.. 

Since you use "kiario" as your username, I guess you're a fan of the car. So why don't you wrap up everything and go for it? 

[trinity]

Oh blimey! It took me a while to see the first "i" of the OPs forum handle "kiario" 

[sathyajithj99]

13 minutes ago, trinity said:

Oh blimey! It took me a while to see the first "i" of the OPs forum handle "kiario" 

[kiario]

1 hour ago, zeem35 said:

Rio looks way better than attrage

it sure is

but jst wanna know a bit more on the tchnicl side

thanks anyway  

 

 

[Quiet]

k*ario

[Iced-T]

how much are these cars? also u must check spare part availability. 

[Frank]

i looked up a few things on Attarge for you,

1. Spacious cabin

2. Best in class turning radius

3. 20.6km /l specified by manufacturer (this may depend on driving style)

4. Better resale value in comparison to a Korean model

5. Leather seats as standard

6. Better ground clearance

7. Proven MIVEC engine

[Frank]

Sorry guys ! Not paid anything 

[Jor-el]

If I were you I would go for the Attrage...

[Supra_Natural]

16 hours ago, Frank said:

Sorry guys ! Not paid anything 

 

Suuuure you're not.

[Quiet]

ko may KIA eke sales buwa ?

[Quiet]

17 hours ago, Frank said:

Sorry guys ! Not paid anything 

ko may KIA eke sales buwa ?

[matroska]

20 hours ago, Frank said:

Sorry guys ! Not paid anything 

of course... and I'm the pied piper of Hamlin.

 

 

[Frank]

On July 19, 2016 at 8:49 AM, kiario said:

Hey guys, 

Good Day.....

Kinda new here, planning for an upgrade, 

kindly help me out to pick one out these two.

I got KIA RIO HATCHBACK and MITSUBISHI ATTRAGE on the list. heard that KIA RIO is efficient enough to do about 15Km per L, and ATTRAGE is more than 20Km per L... Planning to buy brand new condition, not used once.... but no idea about rest of the facts. kindly guide me through with further facts..

thanks.. 

What about Mazda 2 ? Have you chked it out ?