Jump to content

  • Welcome to AutoLanka

    :action-smiley-028: We found you speeding on AutoLanka Forums without any registration! If you want the best experience, please sign in. Safe driving! 

  • 0

Fuel Efficiency

Watchman

Asked by Watchman,

 Share

Question

Watchman Newbie

Watchman

Posted
Posted

Hey!

There’s been a couple of posts asking members how efficient various vehicles are on fuel. And with the prices going up by Rs.8/= and with news in the air that it will go up again by another Rs.3/= soon, its getting even more important…

So what do you say we post the following details

Vehicle :

Transmission Type :

Engine Capacity :

Fuel :

Km per Ltr (city/long distance) :

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Answers 348
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Crosswind
Crosswind

Thts because there's one giant snake in your premio. It comes factory fitted with most premio owners.

SubZero
SubZero

All fuel economy conscious drivers, Please be kind enough to maintain a sane distance with the vehicle in front of you. You might save on fuel, true. But other drivers behind you will burn more tryi

Crosswind
Crosswind

Out of curiosity, how many wheels does your 'car' have? Does it have the following badge in addition to the Axio and hybrid synergy drive badges?

348 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
miniace Newbie

miniace

Posted
Posted
  On 4/25/2012 at 10:29 AM, Magnum said:

yes but the one he has mentioned isnt a NZT260( 2nd gen.) he has mentioned a NZT240(1st gen.)

Not clear what you are trying to highlight mate.You get NZT240 engined second gen versions. Only difference is between ECT and CVT.

MINIACE

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
Magnum Newbie

Magnum

Posted
Posted
  On 4/25/2012 at 10:43 AM, miniace said:

Not clear what you are trying to highlight mate.You get NZT240 engined second gen versions. Only difference is between ECT and CVT.

MINIACE

bro! NZT240 is a chassis number not an engine. What i'm trying to say is that he has mentioned two first generation Allions but with different fuel figures

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
terrabytetango Newbie

terrabytetango

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 4/25/2012 at 1:12 PM, Magnum said:

bro! NZT240 is a chassis number not an engine. What i'm trying to say is that he has mentioned two first generation Allions but with different fuel figures

He means the 2nd generation of the 240, call it a face lift if you will. I believe they were released around 2006 2004 and continued till early/mid 2007, and they have LED taillights and projector headlights as standard and not retrofitted, as quite a few are nowadays, and optional projector headlights. And you confused him, I think he meant the 1NZ-FE.

Edit: Had to call up a mate who owns one such Allion to verify the data.

Edited by terrabytetango
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
Magnum Newbie

Magnum

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 4/25/2012 at 2:19 PM, terrabytetango said:

He means the 2nd generation of the 240, call it a face lift if you will. I believe they were released around 2006 2004 and continued till early/mid 2007, and they have LED taillights and projector headlights as standard and not retrofitted, as quite a few are nowadays, and optional projector headlights. And you confused him, I think he meant the 1NZ-FE.

Edit: Had to call up a mate who owns one such Allion to verify the data.

I did know about the face-lift version,its this

800px-Toyota_Allion_01.jpg

and theres a face-lift version in NZT260 as well, it came out in July 2010 which has a different engine from the one found in the pre-facelift NZT260.

by the way i dint know that 'miniace' was referring to the face lift model

  On 4/25/2012 at 4:39 PM, miniace said:

Yes I stand corrected, thats 1st gen 1NZ-FE engines with ECT trannies and second gen (Post 2006) 1NZ-FE engines with CVTs. Thats the only possible lead to better fuel consumption. 2007 is second gen.

MINIACE

I though you were talking about the NZT260 because you said 'second generation'. the Allion that came out in 2004 is just a face-lift first generation NZT240. Yeah CVT improves fuel efficiency and i guess it improves acceleration as well

but i still have a doubt whether those facelift NZT240's came with CVT because i haven't seen '2' in the gear panel in any other vehicle that has CVT

http://exchange.goo-net.com/usedcars/TOYOTA/ALLION/700030071120120404001/index.html

moreover wikipedia says that only NZT260 came with CVT

Edited by Magnum
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
razordj Newbie

razordj

Posted
Posted (edited)

Vehicle : Honda civic ES8

Transmission : MT

Engine Capacity : 1493CC

Fuel : Euro 3

KM per litre : Average around 13.6kmpl (20km city, 40km highway - Office travel - City figures I am guessing is like 10, 11)

Max did so far: 14.28kmpl (Mixed driving in city and outstation)

Based on distance driven/ fuel spent.

Changing gears below 2000, (below 2500 for sure)

Highway at 3000rpm (100kmph)

Edited by razordj
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
lbnnirmal Newbie

lbnnirmal

Posted
Posted
  On 4/23/2012 at 5:01 PM, Magnum said:

Vehicle : Nissan Bluebird U13

Transmission Type : Manual

Engine Capacity : 2000CC

Fuel : Diesel

Km per Ltr (Combined with A/C mostly) : 16.5

Hay I don't know much about Bluebird but as I have heard Nissan cars are very inefficient on fuel consumption isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
ModX Newbie

ModX

Posted
Posted (edited)

Vehicle : Kia Sorento 2012

Transmission Type : Automatic

Engine Capacity : 2200 cc

Fuel : Super Diesel

Km per Ltr, City : 9

Long Distance : 13 ish

Edited by ModX
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
67Dodge Newbie

67Dodge

Posted
Posted (edited)

Vehicle : Mazda Tribute 2001

Transmission Type : Automatic

Engine Capacity : 2000cc

Fuel : normal pump gas

Km per Ltr, City : 6

Long Distance : 10 (E01 run with hypermilling)

Vehicle : Honda Civic Hybrid FD3

Transmission Type : CVT

Engine Capacity : 1300cc + IMA

Fuel : normal pump gas

Km per Ltr, City : 11

Long Distance : 16/17'ish

Edited by 67Dodge
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
Davy Contributor

Davy

Posted
Posted
  On 7/12/2012 at 3:06 AM, 67Dodge said:

Vehicle : Mazda Tribute 2001

Transmission Type : Automatic

Engine Capacity : 2000cc

Fuel : normal pump gas

Km per Ltr, City : 6

Long Distance : 10 (E01 run with hypermilling)

Vehicle : Honda Civic Hybrid FD3

Transmission Type : CVT

Engine Capacity : 1300cc + IMA

Fuel : normal pump gas

Km per Ltr, City : 11

Long Distance : 16/17'ish

What exactly did you mean by "normal pump gas"? Please let us know what the "abnormal" ones are so that we can avoid them. Thanks!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
67Dodge Newbie

67Dodge

Posted
Posted
  On 7/12/2012 at 3:17 AM, Davy said:

What exactly did you mean by "normal pump gas"? Please let us know what the "abnormal" ones are so that we can avoid them. Thanks!

Just meant the cheapest Petrol & not the higher octane rated stuff.

No disrespect meant to the Abnormal pump gas though! never know when they will pop up again,

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
Schiffer Newbie

Schiffer

Posted
Posted (edited)

Vehicle : Toyota Corona Premio AT210 (1996)

Transmission : Auto

Engine : 1.6ltr

Fuel : Petrol

KMPL City : 7-10 (depend on what mode ur driving)

KMPL Outstaion : 10 - 12 (depend on what mode ur driving)

Edited by Schiffer
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
Magnum Newbie

Magnum

Posted
Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 8:55 AM, lbnnirmal said:

Hay I don't know much about Bluebird but as I have heard Nissan cars are very inefficient on fuel consumption isn't it?

im not worried about other Nissan cars, mine does fine and i'm happy with it

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
hrm Contributor

hrm

Posted
Posted (edited)

Could Mitsubishi worse than Nissan on fuel? I got blasted from my relations when I bought my Lancer for not going for a commont type as Corolla or Sunny.

Edited by hrm
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
Davy Contributor

Davy

Posted
Posted

Vehicle : Mitsubishi Lancer CS3A (2001)

Transmission : Manual

Engine : 1.6 EFI (4G18)

Fuel : Petrol - 95 Octane

Km/l City : 10 - 12

Km/l Outstaion : 14 - 16

* Euro 3 gives pretty much the same figures. Maybe slightly less in the city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to question listing

AutoLanka Cars For Sale

Post Your Ad Free [Click Here]



×
×
  • Create New...